| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Lug Muad'Dib
Wise Humans Sword
57
   |
Posted - 2017.04.02 00:20:19 -
[1] - Quote
Stitch Kaneland wrote:
-keep the velocity bonuses to the hulls, but reduce the range of all light missiles. As far as small ship weapons go, light missiles have ******** range anyway. Most small long range weapons max out around 20-30km, not 42km. Reduce their base range and let the hull bonuses still apply, resulting in a net range nerf, but still keeping the flexibility of the hull bonuses.
You know, missiles flight and target move.. thank for the laugh. |
Lug Muad'Dib
Wise Humans Sword
57
|
Posted - 2017.04.02 01:58:18 -
[2] - Quote
Stitch Kaneland wrote:Lug Muad'Dib wrote:Stitch Kaneland wrote:
-keep the velocity bonuses to the hulls, but reduce the range of all light missiles. As far as small ship weapons go, light missiles have ******** range anyway. Most small long range weapons max out around 20-30km, not 42km. Reduce their base range and let the hull bonuses still apply, resulting in a net range nerf, but still keeping the flexibility of the hull bonuses.
You know, missiles flight and target move.. thank for the laugh. Use rigs if you want velocity, just like turrets have to use optimal rigs or TE's to increase range. There are these things called ballistic tracking enhancers now, use them instead. Stop being bad.
You only touch at 42km if the target don't move, real range are far less, stop being bad. |
Lug Muad'Dib
Wise Humans Sword
58
|
Posted - 2017.04.13 11:27:13 -
[3] - Quote
Soldarius wrote:Players complain about range of light missiles. You response is to nerf range bonuses on all ships when using under-sized missiles?
Maybe just nerf light missile range by 25%? That would be a lot easier.
Problem are only with cruiser |
Lug Muad'Dib
Wise Humans Sword
62
|
Posted - 2017.07.06 08:42:54 -
[4] - Quote
Caleb Seremshur wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:To update everyone, this proposal is currently on hold. We will continue to consider the feedback from the community here and determine whether to move forward with this particular proposal or something else.
Either way no changes in this area will be arriving over the summer, so I've changed the title accordingly.
Thanks. Why not just update the test server with this? So we can take common fits and actually put them through their paces?
Cause they have listen feedback and won't make this change ? |
| |
|